Episode III political?

Rsak · Post by **Rsak** » Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:37 pm

Sorry but this board already gets enough "blah blah blah's" or "waaaah" from your lovely posts that can neither stay on topic or avoid ad hominem attacks.

If you are so afraid of the truth to even look at it objectively then you have no right to attack anyone else by claiming they are "chronically dishonest". You have exhibited a very biased and hidebound determination to acknowledge the truth. That you instead refuse to leave the dark recesses of your mind where only your imagination can comfort your denial of reality.

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Wed Jun 01, 2005 4:49 pm

Sorry but this board already gets enough "blah blah blah's" or "waaaah" from your lovely posts that can neither stay on topic or avoid ad hominem attacks.

LOLLBAR ON A ROFLCAR

Dude... has it entered your mind that -nobody- has come to your defense, and is that not an indicator to you that maybe, just maybe, Harlowe has a point?

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 11:15 am

Tsk tsk big ol' dishonest Rsak.

Who do you think you are kidding? Neither of our posts seldom if ever add anything to a discussion. The big difference is that I am open about it. I have never denied or tried to hide the fact that my posts have little value or content.

I just happen to do it less verbosely to save people the boredom.

You like to play renegade-contrary-mentally-unstable-pseudo-intellectual, and bore people out of the discussion.

Rsak · Post by **Rsak** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:30 pm

Both the nature of this board and the current tactics of Harlowe don't support that conclusion at all Relbeek.

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:42 pm

When numerous people post a picture of a monkey with reference to you, you might want to reflect on your own tactics.

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:42 pm

What nature of the board, Rsak?

Rsak · Post by **Rsak** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:06 pm

Thanks for proving my point Harlowe!

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:07 pm

What nature of the board, Rsak, is it that refutes the conclusion?

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:32 pm

He thinks that he can keep claiming a win or a point, when none exists and it makes it so.

So, I think it's time to just continue claiming a win and play along.

OMG ....RSAK HAS BEEN PWN'D!!!!! DUDE YOU LOSE AT RANTZ!!!!!

Rsak · Post by **Rsak** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:38 pm

Just go ahead and comfort yourself with your delusions and imagination Harlowe

Embar Angylwrath · Post by **Embar Angylwrath** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:44 pm

Rsak wrote:Just go ahead and comfort yourself with your delusions and imagination of Harlowe

Fixed it for Relbeek.

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:38 pm

Do I need to ask you three times, Rsak, or will you simply answer, or admit you don't have the courage to do so?

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:45 pm

Rsak, if you keep projecting, the road to recovery will be that much longer.

Rsak · Post by **Rsak** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:56 pm

You may want to direct that question to Harlowe first since she has yet to answer my direct questions.

But, just to prove to you that I do have the courage to stand behind my words...

There is a nature of this board that has more to do with popularity rather then objectivity. People post on threads to simly jab at other individuals or add to the flames simply because that person is on the defensive. A shark smelling the blood in the water mentality if you will. The board does not reward those for defending the cut individual from the sharks.

And lets be honest what new blood comes into this board with the server merge and the complete and utter lack of EQ rants?

Just about everyone here has preconceived notions about the other posters and we base our opinions largely on those biases rather then the objectivity of what was posted.

I am just as guilty of this type of behavior, however acknowledging it forces us to also acknowledge that "the lack of defense" has very little to do with the truth at all.

clubbin · Post by **clubbin** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 4:39 pm

So if you're right have some balls and answer the question... What's the big deal?

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:09 pm

I answered it, you just didn't like the answer.

You just keep trying to divert from what a dishonest toad you are.

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:10 pm

That was directed at Rsak, not you Clubbin. Though I am sure you knew that. I just wanted to be clear for Rsak's sake.

Rsak · Post by **Rsak** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 5:21 pm

Hmm, no you didn't Harlowe.

I asked you specifically which claim you think was patently false and you have yet to respond. By Relbeek's logic you don't have the courage to do so?

Not that I care about the answer anymore due to our subsequent posts, but if we are going to bandy absolutes around they need to go both ways.

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:36 pm

I've answered you more than once. You continue to be in denial over it.

You claiming I didn't is just another of your fabrications.

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:24 pm

Harlowe answered, Rsak. I saw it.

You just deny it.

And you're only partially right about the nature of the board. Take myself as the canonical example. I have very reliable detractors (Embar, Kulaf, you) and fairly reliable supporters (Partha, Ddrak) on most issues - with very little crossover. (Embar and I ally on death penalty issues, for example.) My "popularity" on this board is hardly questionable. So what's the beef?