Welfare by State

Dumbass pinko-nazi-neoconservative-hippy-capitalists.
rajavengerGIA
Grand Master Architecht
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 10:58 am
Location: wherever the next gnome lives
Contact:

Post by rajavengerGIA »

can someone please answer question fo mine a few psot up really gotten curious about what would happen
here gnomer gnomer gnomer i got a treat for u....BANG
Image
rajavengerGIA
Grand Master Architecht
Posts: 406
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 10:58 am
Location: wherever the next gnome lives
Contact:

Post by rajavengerGIA »

rajavengerGIA wrote:one question well say i paid 100,000 in taxes in say 1920 and i lived in a blue state would that mean i would get 90,000 in cash or would i get the amount of money 90,000 dollars back then would be now
can someone please answer this im really wondering what would happen
here gnomer gnomer gnomer i got a treat for u....BANG
Image
User avatar
Arathena
kNight of the Sun (oxymoron)
Posts: 1622
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 4:37 pm

Post by Arathena »

Through the miracle of compund interest, a federal park not less than 150 miles away from your home would have platnium toilets, and the paths would be paved with gold, and not just any gold, but 14 carat gold carved with bas-relief scenes of people fucking. You, however, would not get a cent.
Archfiend Arathena Sa`Riik
Poison Arrow
User avatar
SicTimMitchell
E Pluribus Sputum
Posts: 5153
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 1:05 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Contact:

Post by SicTimMitchell »

can someone please answer this
MU!

In other words, the question doesn't apply. By Ddrak's definition, your welfare comes in the form of military security, law enforcement, public schools, hospitals, transportation and etc.

BTW, this is why while, like everybody else in the country, I hate paying taxes -- but I think they're a bargain for our standard of living.
Bangzoom
94 Ranger of Karana
Veteran Crew, through and through
_______________________________________________________________________________
Aabe
Knight of the Brazen Hussy
Posts: 1135
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 3:47 pm
Location: St. George, UT golf capital o th' world.

Post by Aabe »

I still dont like the statistics of the whole thing. If the fed builds a national hiway throughout the country. Cost per capita in Califorina for its segment is much less than in Montana. To imply that Montana is getting welfare, because it had to comply just doesn't seem honest. Not to mention the percent of people out of state using the hiway in Montana to cross through it vs the in state folks usingi it has yet to be compared to the other states ratio and factored in.
Ddrak
Save a Koala, deport an Australian
Posts: 17517
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
Location: Straya mate!
Contact:

Post by Ddrak »

All it means is that people in CA (or another similar state) are partially funding that highway in Montana. You can draw what you will from those stats.

Dd
Post Reply