I hate over the top shit. Especialy if it isnt needed. I love violents, I love stunts. Until they break the laws of physics, and common sense. A movie with a good plot doesnt need the biggest of the biggest explosions, crashes, and stunts. It just needs a good ending. Die Hard had a good plot, with no ending other than boom..they live. (other than they should be dead from radiation poisoning in 3 days)
I actually wated to see this from the fact that the trailer. It looked good...and well, cause It didn't show insane over the top impossible stunts, like the last one....Then I saw the movie. I was surprised that John Mclane has become a homocidal maniac behind the wheel. I guess he doesnt like innocent Russian people in cars.
No one flies, but - You will beleive a man can fall 40 feet and only get winded - Repeatedly. I have a freind that always tells me to go with it. Repeatedly. I have to admit it was fun. But be prepared to have inteligents insulted. The worst of the worst? The spray can with magical radiation killing mist. 10 second spray and Chenobol was cleansed. As if The father, and son with terminator bodies wasnt enuff.
It was fun, bad, but fun.
Good Day to Die Hard
-
- Intimate Sexretary
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:09 pm
Good Day to Die Hard
Mastrloo
70 Iksar Monk
7 years later.
The hills are still triangles.
And the trees are still blocks.
70 Iksar Monk
7 years later.
The hills are still triangles.
And the trees are still blocks.
-
- Save a Koala, deport an Australian
- Posts: 17516
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 3:00 pm
- Location: Straya mate!
- Contact:
- Garrdor
- Damnit Jim!
- Posts: 2951
- Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2002 9:02 pm
- Location: Oregon
Re: Good Day to Die Hard
Sequels mostly suck

Didn't your mama ever tell you not to tango with a carrot?