Why "liberal activist judges" are a GOOD thing...
-
- Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 15871
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:16 am
- Location: Eagan, MN
-
- kNight of the Sun (oxymoron)
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:44 pm
hmmm
uhhh...
Relbeek... ruling anything because it is unconstitutionally vague is a... a... a... you guessed it... 200 year old rule that is considered interpretting a law conservatively..
Walrus
Relbeek... ruling anything because it is unconstitutionally vague is a... a... a... you guessed it... 200 year old rule that is considered interpretting a law conservatively..
Walrus
-
- Patriarch N0achite
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:09 am
- Location: Springfield, IL
- Contact:
-
- 3Lekt of Fift33n
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 8:47 am
- Location: None of your damn business
- Contact:
District Court Judge Sally Loehrer
If that Judge has a "little general" then there is something wrong...
btw
Fet
If that Judge has a "little general" then there is something wrong...
btw
what's the point of them getting naked and shaking the money maker then? Unless they are all practicing to join the circus or something. Maybe it's time for a Vegas road tripCity attorneys told Loehrer touching is illegal when dancers engage in contact aimed at sexually arousing the customer
Fet
-
- The Dark Lord of Felwithe
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 5:25 pm
Frankly, aside from the rather imbecilic title Relbeek chose for the thread, there's nothing here that I care about one way or another.
Las Vegas can do whatever it wants. Nevada can do whatever it wants. If Vegas wants to pass a "look but don't touch" law for strippers, and the judge wants them to word it more carefully, I don't see a problem with what the judge did nor would I call it activism. All Vegas has to do is reword the law and pass it again.
If the judge had said thad ANY "look but don't touch" law was unconstitutional because the Nevada constitution has a fondling clause implicit somewhere in it, then I might think she was overstepping her place.
Unless the Nevada Constitution DOES recognize a fundamental right to grope of course...you never know about Las Vegas...it could happen.
Las Vegas can do whatever it wants. Nevada can do whatever it wants. If Vegas wants to pass a "look but don't touch" law for strippers, and the judge wants them to word it more carefully, I don't see a problem with what the judge did nor would I call it activism. All Vegas has to do is reword the law and pass it again.
If the judge had said thad ANY "look but don't touch" law was unconstitutional because the Nevada constitution has a fondling clause implicit somewhere in it, then I might think she was overstepping her place.
Unless the Nevada Constitution DOES recognize a fundamental right to grope of course...you never know about Las Vegas...it could happen.
-
- Der Fuhrer
- Posts: 15871
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:16 am
- Location: Eagan, MN
-
- Druish Princess
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 3:22 pm
-
- Patriarch N0achite
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:09 am
- Location: Springfield, IL
- Contact: