Why "liberal activist judges" are a GOOD thing...

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:27 pm

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s ... _dance_law

HELL Yeah.

superwalrus · Post by **superwalrus** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:52 am

uhhh...

Relbeek... ruling anything because it is unconstitutionally vague is a... a... a... you guessed it... 200 year old rule that is considered interpretting a law conservatively..

Walrus

JamiesanTGrauerwolf · Post by **JamiesanTGrauerwolf** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:16 am

Shut up and go get a lap dance in Vegase.

Torakus · Post by **Torakus** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 3:36 pm

I have to think, "tittie club patron" describes this judge better than "liberal activist".

Good for him though, what fucking good is a lap dance if your little general isn't getting a little petting?

Torakus

Fetten · Post by **Fetten** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 4:14 pm

District Court Judge Sally Loehrer
If that Judge has a "little general" then there is something wrong...

btw

City attorneys told Loehrer touching is illegal when dancers engage in contact aimed at sexually arousing the customer

what's the point of them getting naked and shaking the money maker then? Unless they are all practicing to join the circus or something. Maybe it's time for a Vegas road trip

Fet

Eidolon Faer · Post by **Eidolon Faer** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 4:56 pm

Frankly, aside from the rather imbecilic title Relbeek chose for the thread, there's nothing here that I care about one way or another.

Las Vegas can do whatever it wants. Nevada can do whatever it wants. If Vegas wants to pass a "look but don't touch" law for strippers, and the judge wants them to word it more carefully, I don't see a problem with what the judge did nor would I call it activism. All Vegas has to do is reword the law and pass it again.

If the judge had said thad ANY "look but don't touch" law was unconstitutional because the Nevada constitution has a fondling clause implicit somewhere in it, then I might think she was overstepping her place.

Unless the Nevada Constitution DOES recognize a fundamental right to grope of course...you never know about Las Vegas...it could happen.

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:27 pm

Oh, there you go again.

The amazing thing is my initial post was intended completely light-heartedly and people still gotta get sand in their vaginas about it.

Torakus · Post by **Torakus** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:13 pm

Hey women have little generals that need petted too, course licking them makes them stand up straighter.

Tora

Grygonos Thunderwulf · Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:32 am

perhaps a jane thomas?

JamiesanTGrauerwolf · Post by **JamiesanTGrauerwolf** » Tue Jan 25, 2005 8:57 am

Yeah, and what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas!

Brell Rants

Why "liberal activist judges" are a GOOD thing...

Why "liberal activist judges" are a GOOD thing...

hmmm