Why "liberal activist judges" are a GOOD thing...

Dumbass pinko-nazi-neoconservative-hippy-capitalists.
Post Reply
Relbeek Einre
Der Fuhrer
Posts: 15871
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:16 am
Location: Eagan, MN

Why "liberal activist judges" are a GOOD thing...

Post by Relbeek Einre »

superwalrus
kNight of the Sun (oxymoron)
Posts: 1735
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 4:44 pm

hmmm

Post by superwalrus »

uhhh...

Relbeek... ruling anything because it is unconstitutionally vague is a... a... a... you guessed it... 200 year old rule that is considered interpretting a law conservatively..

Walrus
JamiesanTGrauerwolf
Patriarch N0achite
Posts: 874
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:09 am
Location: Springfield, IL
Contact:

Post by JamiesanTGrauerwolf »

Shut up and go get a lap dance in Vegase. :-P
Torakus
Ignore me, I am drunk again
Posts: 1295
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 10:04 am

Post by Torakus »

I have to think, "tittie club patron" describes this judge better than "liberal activist".

Good for him though, what fucking good is a lap dance if your little general isn't getting a little petting?

Torakus
Fetten
3Lekt of Fift33n
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 8:47 am
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Post by Fetten »

District Court Judge Sally Loehrer
If that Judge has a "little general" then there is something wrong...

btw
City attorneys told Loehrer touching is illegal when dancers engage in contact aimed at sexually arousing the customer
what's the point of them getting naked and shaking the money maker then? Unless they are all practicing to join the circus or something. Maybe it's time for a Vegas road trip


Fet
Eidolon Faer
The Dark Lord of Felwithe
Posts: 3237
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 5:25 pm

Post by Eidolon Faer »

Frankly, aside from the rather imbecilic title Relbeek chose for the thread, there's nothing here that I care about one way or another.

Las Vegas can do whatever it wants. Nevada can do whatever it wants. If Vegas wants to pass a "look but don't touch" law for strippers, and the judge wants them to word it more carefully, I don't see a problem with what the judge did nor would I call it activism. All Vegas has to do is reword the law and pass it again.

If the judge had said thad ANY "look but don't touch" law was unconstitutional because the Nevada constitution has a fondling clause implicit somewhere in it, then I might think she was overstepping her place.

Unless the Nevada Constitution DOES recognize a fundamental right to grope of course...you never know about Las Vegas...it could happen.
Relbeek Einre
Der Fuhrer
Posts: 15871
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:16 am
Location: Eagan, MN

Post by Relbeek Einre »

Oh, there you go again.

The amazing thing is my initial post was intended completely light-heartedly and people still gotta get sand in their vaginas about it.
Torakus
Ignore me, I am drunk again
Posts: 1295
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 10:04 am

Post by Torakus »

Hey women have little generals that need petted too, course licking them makes them stand up straighter.

Tora
Grygonos Thunderwulf
Druish Princess
Posts: 780
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 3:22 pm

Post by Grygonos Thunderwulf »

perhaps a jane thomas?
JamiesanTGrauerwolf
Patriarch N0achite
Posts: 874
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 11:09 am
Location: Springfield, IL
Contact:

Post by JamiesanTGrauerwolf »

Yeah, and what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas!
Post Reply