Cops: Boy, 7, Beat Baby Sister to Death

Kulaf · Post by **Kulaf** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 10:31 am

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,158373,00.html

Some people......are just wired wrong.

Post by **Ddrak** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 10:34 am

I'm sorry, but what the hell were the parents doing "visiting with neighbors" at midnight and leaving the 7 year old alone with the baby?

If I had to take a guess, this is going to turn out to be a seriously fucked up family situation.

Dd

Embar Angylwrath · Post by **Embar Angylwrath** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 10:36 am

Should he get the death penalty?

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 11:22 am

No, but definitely institutionalized. The father should be facing some sort of criminal charge.

I doubt this is the one and only time the child has committed a violent act and a 7 year old has no business being alone with a baby, let alone one with aggression issues.

Kulaf · Post by **Kulaf** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 11:55 am

Let's not forget it was midnight.....and the boy knew where his father was. They should have both been in bed sleetping. If the baby was crying the boy could have simply went outside and got his father. Instead he beat the baby with his fists and feet and a 2x4.

Embar Angylwrath · Post by **Embar Angylwrath** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:02 pm

Harlowe wrote:No, but definitely institutionalized. The father should be facing some sort of criminal charge.

I doubt this is the one and only time the child has committed a violent act and a 7 year old has no business being alone with a baby, let alone one with aggression issues.

Why doesn't he deserve the death penalty, Harlowe?

Kulaf · Post by **Kulaf** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:07 pm

I honestly don't know what to do with aberations. I don't think this child will ever lead a "normal" life and will probably end up incarcerated for most of his natural life.

I truely believe that some people are just born violent. They are hardwired anti-social abberations and they need to be dealt with in some way.

Trollbait · Post by **Trollbait** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:25 pm

Why doesn't he deserve the death penalty, Harlowe?

Why don't you dispense with the sillyness and make your point. We all know you're against the death penalty as are many on this board including me. That is annoying.

Embar Angylwrath · Post by **Embar Angylwrath** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:32 pm

Why don't you answer the question? If you are for the death penalty, why doesn't this child deserve death?

Kulaf · Post by **Kulaf** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:42 pm

Why don't we let him drive a car?

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:43 pm

He's not for the death penalty, dumbass.

Partha · Post by **Partha** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:45 pm

Embar, you say that like the alternative is to put him in a private school.

Harlowe · Post by **Harlowe** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:59 pm

Embar, where have I been in support of the death penalty?

Whether I think some people deserve death or not, I certainly can't be for it, considering our legal system.

Morally, I do agree it's barbaric.

Embar Angylwrath · Post by **Embar Angylwrath** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:05 pm

The question was more directed at Jecks, than you Harlowe.

Trollbait · Post by **Trollbait** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:12 pm

I generally do not get to "PWN" people........so allow me to savor the moment.

........................................................................

There. Ok.

You asked....

Why doesn't he deserve the death penalty, Harlowe?

Then you said......

Why don't you answer the question? If you are for the death penalty, why doesn't this child deserve death?

But I had already said.....

We all know you're against the death penalty as are many on this board including me

Which would mean I am against the death penalty you boob.

So why would you say.....

The question was more directed at Jecks, than you Harlowe.

when you clearly had already posed the question directly to Harlowe and I had already said I am anti death penalty?

Post by **Relbeek Einre** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:26 pm

/applaud

Well delivered, Jecks. Well delivered.

Garrdor · Post by **Garrdor** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:34 pm

Hahahahahaha

I hope Lifetime makes it into a movie 4tw.

Embar Angylwrath · Post by **Embar Angylwrath** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:50 pm

Ack.

My bad Jecks. I missed the part about you being against the death penalty. For some reason, I thought you were in favor of it.

What I'm trying to get at, and the pro-death penalty people are avoiding, is why the kid shouldn't get the death penalty. Not won't get the death penalty (he won't because he's too young, and current law forbids execution of minors), but shouldn't.

They could argue mental capacity, but we've put to death people that have less cognitive ability than a seven year old. They could argue age, but that, too , has been a floating standard.

It was my attempt to get a pro-death penalty supporter to engage in a debate of the criteria used to determine whether or not an individual receives death.

Kulaf · Post by **Kulaf** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:52 pm

I am for the death penalty. So I will answer it. The question has to be tempered by the competency of the person. I don't necessarily feel that a child of 7 has the competence to fully understand what they have done.

Kulaf · Post by **Kulaf** » Thu Jun 02, 2005 1:53 pm

/debate on

Brell Rants

Cops: Boy, 7, Beat Baby Sister to Death

Cops: Boy, 7, Beat Baby Sister to Death

Re: